Ответы
Ответ:
In my childhood, we always dreamed of having real pets - fluffy cats and playful dogs. However, over time, robots emerged on the market, designed to replace real pets. And now the choice became challenging - real pets or robots?
I had a real cat named Milo. When I came home, he always greeted me, stretched toward me, and purred. Milo could sense my moods and was always there for me when I felt down. However, when a robotic cat appeared at home, Milo started feeling competition.
The robotic cat looked incredibly similar to a real one. It moved, purred, even looked alive. But it couldn't sense my emotions, didn't react to playful moods or tears. It was a cold mechanism that, although resembling a cat, lacked the warmth of a real living creature.
Initially, I played with the robot, but over time, I realized that it couldn't replace the genuine warmth and loyalty Milo provided. Yes, the robot could be an interesting novelty, but no artificial substitute could convey the special connection between a person and their real pet.
Thus, despite all technological advancements, real pets remain unparalleled. Their loyalty and uniqueness give life a special meaning that can't be achieved by any robots or artificial replacements.
Ответ:
Real pets are fluffy and easy to pick up (based on height thought). Sadly, they do a lot of bad things, especially cats. Real pets and robot pets still have their own living limits. Robot pets can get broken, or lost, like real pets, they can get lost too. It hard to harm robot pets with usual things that can pets die from. Robot pets don't require food, but they need batteries. Robot pets don't have any fluff, but sometimes people put fluff on it. Robot pets are smarter than real pets.
Объяснение: